DECEMBER 21-2017
OPEN LETTER
TO (assorted) JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
cc Governor
General Julie Payette
FROM: Roger Callow aka The Outlawed Canadian in an
outlaw Justice System due to systematic
judicial malfeasance.
1) Section 40 of the Supreme Court Rules enunciates matters
which may be handled by the SCofC. Generally, these
are Appeals from lower courts. However, this section permits the SCofC to deal with any matter pertinent to the legal
welfare of the country. Such is this Appeal
July 10-2016 (excerpts) 3 pages
TO: Supreme Court of Canada FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff 36993 (SK)
ATTN: Jill Haché (Registry)
Re: Roger Callow v. Board of School Trustees
(S.D. #45 West Vancouver, B.C.) 36993
17) 3 more SCofC judges no doubt are being
pressured to sacrifice their reputations along with Justices Wagner, Coté, Cromwell (r.) by failing to call for disclosure in 36993 SK prior to any
examination of this issue on any level.
CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - SEPT.01-2016 (excerpts)
JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW
for the Employee's Case(Canada)
2b)...The same three
judges - Cromwell (retired Sept. 01-16)/ Coté / Wagner sat on both cases amid my most vehement
opposition as known to the Justice Minister and Prime Minister. Under those
circumstances, P.M. Trudeau has no choice but to expel Chief Justice
Beverley McLachlin
(whom sat on the first enquiry in 1997). The other 4 SCofC
justices are honour-bound to turn in their resignations and refuse to sit
alongside Coté and Wagner.
August 08-2016
(excerpts)
TO: Minister of Justice (Canada) FROM:
Roger Callow - self represented plaintiff
Hon. J. Wilson-Raybould SCofC
36993 (SK)
cc SCofC 36993 SK ATTN: Hon. Coté/Wagner
/ PMO / RCMP
N.B. This matter is about an unresolved
labour case where no compensation has been paid
dating from 1985 in B.C. The current legal situation since that time in a
number of courts across Canada has been exacerbated by documented systematic judicial malfeasance reported
to oversight bodies which, for the most part do not respond. In particular,
that includes federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson Raybould.
That omission has left the Prime Minister exposed to having to use his
executive powers over a justice system out of control.
QUOTE: There
is right, there is wrong, and there is the law.' The
Halls of Justice Lee Gruenfeld
This letter is
focused on a) the SCofC irregularities upcoming in the hearing of 36993
1) A discussion of 36993 SK
requires some background from 36883 QC
dismissed for a hearing on June 09-2016 by judges Cromwell (r. Sept 01-2016), Coté, and Wagner. Currently, against my fervent objections,
attempts are being made to have the same 3 hear 36993.
2) While realizing that the SCofC has limited
personnel for the purpose; nonetheless, by refusing this hearing of 36883 solely on disclosure being sought by me for 30 years, the 3 judges in their
wisdom condoned the egregious court abuses in Quebec in this case embarrassing
Premier Couillard (whom has been kept apprised of all
these judicial misdemeanors) to the extent that Quebecers can no longer trust
to their courts of law.
3) A parallel situation exists in SK where alleged fraudulent activity
goes unchecked. For example, the SK Appeal Court met the Employer defendant ex parte and between them agreed that
the Employer would not speak in court thus obviating my questions as to their
alleged fraudulency. The SK Legal Society refuses to examine these accusations.
4) Whether correct or not, the impression left is that if the same SCofC judges are prepared to cover up judicial excesses in
QC; then surely they can be expected to do the same thing for SK.
5) When contacted by 'Melissa' of the SC of C by telephone on August
08-2016 to discuss the above, I requested that SCofC
Chief Justice B. McLachlin make the judge selection determination;
not the Registry. (N.B. McLachlin j. was earlier the target
of a Form 25C (conflict of interest)
in 2004 when this case was rejected under the 'ultimate remedy' provisions thus
freezing me in limbo and reducing Canada to Third World status where a Canadian
contract is 'not worth the paper on which is printed' plus sanctioning 'no
legal answer is a legal answer' in this kafkaesque
caper. McLachlin had earlier sat in 1997 with Chief
Justice A. Lamers(d) in rejecting this case on
essentially the same constitutional question now before the 'reluctant' AB
courts. Since that time 25C has been removed from the SCofC
Rules)
6) Once again, I have little interest in financing the Case in SK over the
judicial peccadilloes as was the case in QC. If the authorities wish to ignore
these transgressions; they should step down (including the P.M.)
7) Disclosure has been called for in both courts although
the QC courts were limited to that item; more as a false flag to reveal the
existence of a grey eminence whom has
back-door access to the Offices of the chief justices and the subsequent
appointment of judges with a reputation of 'just following orders'. Coté and Wagner strike me as that type which is all the
more reason as to why they should not sit on 36993 SK. Surely those two have sufficient ethics to recuse themselves voluntarily for I do not believe it is
necessary for me to make an application to that effect. Here's where Wilson-Raybould should enter the picture....
- 0 -
ACTION REQUESTED FROM SCofC
JUDGES (DECEMBER 21-2017)
A) As Richard Wagner j. has been confirmed as the new Chief Justice to
replace Beverley McLachlin whom retired on Dec.
15-2017, this letter which would be normally addressed to the new Chief Justice
is now being directed to the other judges on the SCofC
panel for reasons mentioned above.
B) McLachlin was also President of the Canadian
Council of Judges where I have renewed my request to examine the apparent
fraud of Ottawa Supreme Court judges Colin McKinnon j. and Robert Scott j.
(originally appointed by the Federal Court). McKinnon's bombastic statement
from 2014 is still being widely disseminated in the 'Book of Authorities' which
QC, SK, NS and the SCofC refuse to analyze making a
mockery of the justice system.
C) An action of fraud is currently being lodged in B.C. in which I have
called in Premier Horgan to expedite matters. While
the McKinnon caper has not yet been included in B.C., logic tells us that Harris
& Co. which served in SK and NS (Hicks,
Morley et al in ON / Lavery de Billy in QC. The Legal Societies in
both provinces ducked out of dealing with their perfidy although it is only ON
which I am currently pursuing under an Appeal to Premier Wynne) (SEE web 2018).
D) The proper course of the extant SCofC judges
is to excuse Wagner and Coté from any discussion on
the above apparent transgressions. Canada deserves to know of your outcome on
this issue as to the credibility of the Justice System in general.
Yours truly,
Roger Callow
self-represented
litigant